Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms

Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms

Summary for agile leaders

Survey of 716 managers from four firms predicts managers' ambidexterity increases with (individual, rather than formal structural) decision-making authority, and their participation in cross-functional interfaces.
The authors suggest three characteristics of ambidextrous managers: they host contradictions; are multitaskers; and continuously update their knowledge, skills, and expertise.

Reviewed: 02 Jan 2023 by Russ Lewis
Request full analysis of this paper 
Authors: 
Tom J. M. Mom, Frans A. J. van den Bosch, Henk W. Volberda
Publication date: 
2009
DOI: 
10.1287/orsc.1090.0427

My classifications

Abstract

Previous research focuses on firm and business unit level ambidexterity. Therefore, conceptual and empirically validated understanding about ambidexterity at the individual level of analysis is very scarce. This paper addresses this gap in the literature by investigating managers' ambidexterity, delivering three contributions to theory and empirical research on ambidexterity: first, by proposing three related characteristics of ambidextrous managers; second, by developing a model and associated hypotheses on both the direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms on managers' ambidexterity; and third, by testing the hypotheses based on a sample of 716 business unit level and operational level managers. Findings regarding the formal structural mechanisms indicate that a manager's decision-making authority positively relates to this manager's ambidexterity, whereas formalization of a manager's tasks has no significant relationship with this manager's ambidexterity. Regarding the personal coordination mechanisms, findings indicate that both the participation of a manager in cross-functional interfaces and the connectedness of a manager to other organization members positively relate to this manager's ambidexterity. Furthermore, results show positive interaction effects between the formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms on managers' ambidexterity. The paper's theoretical contributions and empirical results increase our understanding about managers' ambidexterity and about how different types and combinations of coordination mechanisms relate to variation in managers' ambidexterity.

Cite as (Harvard referencing)

Mom, T.J.M., van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W., 2009. Understanding Variation in Managers’ Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms. Organization Science 20, 812–828

Latest posts

5 Reasons Hanging by a Thread is my new favourite paper!

Read more...
Copyright © Russ G Lewis 2022-2023